Mike Pence Wins Values Voter Summit Straw Poll

This one kind of surprised me. I know it's probably not indicative of how the majority of conservative voters would vote, but if you'd asked me who I thought might top the list Mike Pence wouldn't have come to mind at all. I like him, have no problems with him being up there, but still a surprise. 

Who would you vote for if the election for president happened this year? Lots of good choices on the list below.

Mike Pence Wins Values Summit Straw Poll

U.S. Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) has won Family Research Council Action's third-ever Values Voter Summit Straw Poll. Gov. Mike Huckabee finished in a close second place.

Only FRC Action members who were present at the event were allowed to vote.

Family Research Council Action President Tony Perkins released the following statement in reaction to the 2010 Values Voter Summit Straw Poll: "The results of the presidential straw poll reflect the outcome of recent elections. Those who are truly conservative, fiscally and socially, are enthusiastically supported by voters."

The following are the straw poll results:

Presidential Candidate Name Total Votes Percentage

Mike Pence 170 24%
Mike Huckabee 159 22%
Mitt Romney 93 13%
Newt Gingrich 72 10%
Sarah Palin 51 7%
Rick Santorum 39 5%
Jim DeMint 38 5%
Bobby Jindal 15 2%
Mitch Daniels 13 2%
Chris Christie 11 2%
John Thune 11 2%
Bob McDonnell 10 1%
Marco Rubio 10 1%
Paul Ryan 7 1%
Haley Barbour 6 1%
Ron Paul 5 1%
Jan Brewer 1 0%
Undecided 12 2%

Vice Presidential Candidate Responses:

Mike Pence 119 16%
Sarah Palin 112 15%
Rick Santorum 75 10%
Paul Ryan 51 7%
Jim DeMint 45 6%
Mike Huckabee 43 6%
Marco Rubio 43 6%
Bobby Jindal 36 5%
Bob McDonnell 31 4%
Chris Christie 25 3%
Mitt Romney 25 3%
Newt Gingrich 24 3%
Jan Brewer 20 3%
John Thune 15 2%
Mitch Daniels 10 1%
Haley Barbour 6 1%
Ron Paul 5 1%
Undecided 38 5%

Members of FRC Action are only allowed to vote once. For more information on the Values Voter Summit, log onto www.valuesvotersummit.org.

Few articles on the porkulus package

We HAVE to do everything we can to stop this thing. I'm sending messages saying fight with everything you have in your power to cut as much pork from the bill, then when it's pared down as much as possible, vote against it anyway.

Here are a few article links to give you an overview of the variety of views on this thing. On the last story re: Democrat poll finds voters like the stimulus... that flies in the face of every poll I've seen or heard about. I haven't read the article, but I have a feeling they asked a question that led to the answer they wanted.

Wash. Times: Obama: Nation can't afford bickering over stimulus

NYT: Stimulus Plan Encounters Stiff Resistance in Senate

Politico: Schumer: We'll get to 60

LAT: Obama turns to e-mail network to push stimulus plan

The Hill: Democratic poll finds voters like stimulus

Don't let the polls sway you...

I've complained for years about political (and other) polls and surveys. I've always thought they were slanted, and I've always wondered why they never called our house so we could participate. It seemed suspect that all the surveys touted numbers for the average American and yet they never managed to talk to anyone in our household, or anyone I knew. (Yes, it did cross my mind that maybe we were just a strange household, completely outside the norm... ;-)

I suppose part of the reason we never got to participate could be, probably is, that once we added caller ID to our phone some years back we pretty much stopped answering toll-free calls. (duh) Now we're on the do-not-call list so there are fewer, but we still ignore the majority. Our fault we're not polled!

Today on a whim I answered a call and got to participate in a survey paid for by McCain's campaign. I gather they're calling all the registered Republicans, or maybe just the so-called "super voters" (those who religiously vote in every election).

I'll be picking up the phone from now on. It was short, sweet, fun and slanted. Very slanted.

Three questions (not exact, but close enough). Keep in mind they didn't say who was paying for the survey up front, they waited until AFTER the survey to do the legal notice. No problem on my end, wouldn't have affected my choices but I can certainly understand not wanting to taint the response by saying so up front.

Question #1 - If you were voting today who would be your number one choice for President. Press 1 for Ron Paul, 2 for John McCain, 3 for Mitt Romney.

Question #2 - Who would be your second choice. Same three candidates.

Question #3 - Which of the following issues is most important in your selection (or something to that affect): Economy, Terrorism (or war on terrorism, can't remember exactly), Immigration, character of the candidate, Values, other... I may have missed one in the mix, but the choice was between a group of hot-button issues.

Did you catch the obvious? Where was Huckabee in the questioning? He's number 3 in the national polls yet they didn't give him as a choice.

I would bet there will be a press release at some point from McCain sharing the results of the poll. It's going to put him as the number one or two choice for Republicans in Georgia.

In Georgia Huckabee has a strong following. By leaving him out of the mix it totally skews any results in any state, but particularly in a handful of southern states.

If the McCain camp paid for the poll simply as a fact-finding mission, they are being steered in the wrong direction by their pollsters.

Regarding the choices in question three. What would you answer? Is the war on terror less important to you than immigration? Do you discount values or place them lower on the scale when making a decision than the economy? I had a difficult time with that question. My choice for the Republican nominee is not based on one factor, it's a mix of factors. Again, I suppose people will do like I did and just punch one.

For those out there who are making their choice for the Republican candidate based on polling that shows one person has a better chance of beating the Democratic winner, beware. You have no idea who's conducting those polls and what kind of questions they're asking.... and what they're leaving out when they poll. How many of those polls are sponsored by the media? How many are made by Democratic leaning groups? What if we're being steered like a herd of cattle toward the candidate of choice? What if it's true that Republicans win when they stick to their conservative values when voting? What if fear of Hillary and Obama leads to a choice that gives us heartburn for four years or longer?

I would suggest that you think long and hard about why you're making the choice you're making.
Look carefully at the candidates, their beliefs, values, past actions, character, stances on the issues and other factors but don't let the press bamboozle you into thinking that the results of their polls should factor into your decision. If you like the candidate in every other way and those erratic polls are not a factor, great, vote your conscious.

Note: I wrote a blog a while back on an on-line political poll I took. Same problem, choices that left you no choices. I'll see if I can find a link and will post it for those who have signed on since then and may not have read it!

Skewed Polls

Happened to see what I thought was a link to presidential poll results while wandering around on the Internet. It turned out to be a poll on how you'd vote by Polling Point. I had a minute or two, was curious, so I took the poll.

They gave a lot of scenario: If this Democrat were pitted against this Republican who would you vote for? Are you conservative, moderate, liberal? Democrat or Republican? Lots of questions related to politics plus some demographic questions.

All fine and dandy, pretty clear cut questions until it got to one where they asked which Democrat you would vote for if that were your only choices.

Now keep in mind that in every other question involving voting for candidates there was the option of "not sure" or "would not vote."

In the question regarding which Democrat would you vote for they listed all the potential candidates and then additional option "Not Sure".

So, I was forced to say "not sure" or pick one of the Democrats if I wanted to continue with the poll.

It won't come as a surprise to anyone who reads my columns regularly that I vote Republican. My answer would have been, if given the choice, "would not vote."

That question was completely out of whack with all the rest of the questions. Any answer would make it appear that as a voting Republican I would vote for a Democratic candidate.

How many people opted for "not sure" and how many just decided to pick what they considered the one they felt would do the least damage? Accurate results? Nah. No way.

There was a place for comment at the end, so, of course Ms. Opinionated Me left a comment. The group that put that poll out there are professional pollsters. They knew exactly what they were doing. I wasn't telling them anything they didn't already know. I'll know when I hear some media type hyping the fact that some number of Republicans would vote for Richardson or Biden or Obama that they tricked them into the answer. So will you.

I'm heading over to http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html. I'm going to do their Candidate Calculator to see which candidate they think lines up most closely with my views.

It should be fun, but... who's the one that decides what the candidates will actually do or how they feel about the subjects I'm going to see on the calculator? After I run through the drill, I may pop back over here and write another blog. Or I might save it for another day... it's a Saturday night and there's a presidential candidate debate in one hour... oh boy, four whole hours of listening to candidates try to steer clear of making a gaff. What better way to spend a Saturday night?